[Contents | About
| Opening by Buehrens | Opening by Rankin | Dialogue | Questions from Audience | Closing by Buehrens | Closing by Rankin ]
|
Homosexuality and the
Boy Scouts: |
Opening Statement by John
Buehrens
|
|
I want to begin by quoting from a 15-year old Boy Scout, who was quoted
in the New York Times. I had a powerful experience myself growing up in Scouts. I began at the
age of eleven as so many boys do. I didn’t quite get to earn my Eagle
badge. I moved at the crucial moment and finished my secondary education
in Italy, not America. But my first introduction to what it meant to be a
citizen was in Boy Scouts. And I mean a citizen in a global sense because
that realization came to me at a World Jamboree held in 1959 in Colorado
Springs. I remember Dwight Eisenhower, then President, coming to visit us.
We were camped on the grounds of what became the Air Force Academy. I met
kids from all around the world. All kinds of different people. And for me
Scouts was an opening up to wanting to be a part of a world that embraced
all different kinds of people. Several times during my ministry I found occasion to work with Scouts
again. Most particularly during the parish ministry that I held just
before I was elected president of our Association, when I served at one of
our congregations in New York City. We were working through a children’s
task force with the kids then living in the city’s infamous welfare
hotels. Two of the young adults in my congregation, a young
African-American man and a young Latino man, who had both benefited from
scouting enormously in their growing up, met the kids in the Prince George
Welfare Hotel in lower Manhattan, and said these kids need a good
structured program. Let it be Scouting. We formed the first Scout troop
for homeless boys. We were proud to do that as a congregation. We decided
to ignore the fact that one of the co-founders of the troop was gay. All across the country, many conscientious Scout leaders have I suspect
over the years been gay. It never was an issue until about 1990, when
suddenly the Boy Scouts of America, as a national organization decided to
take away from local parents and sponsoring organizations the right of
those parents and those sponsoring organizations to judge the fitness of
the volunteers working with youth. In setting a blanket policy of
discrimination on this point, it’s important to point out that they
departed from the practice of virtually every other national youth
organization existent. The YWCA does not discriminate. The YMCA does not
discriminate. Camp Fire Boys and Girls, and any other national youth
organization you can name, have long since decided that the proper thing
to do is of course do good screening of volunteers. Set an atmosphere
where there is good training about the potential for abuse. Good reporting
systems and training of other volunteers to be alert to any potential. But
in the course of doing that they’ve also learned what my 15-year old Scout
has learned. That the dangers for young boys, men, in scouting don’t come
from open and well-adjusted gay people. The Girl Scouts know that. They
don’t discriminate. The Boy Scouts on the other hand, I guess may have decided to play
religious politics -- religious politics –- and not to be a civic
education organization teaching young people to grow up in a world of real
diversity. You see, they could have placed the responsibility for choosing
who is an appropriate role model, in the sponsoring organizations behind
local troops and Cub packs, quite easily. But the religious politics in
which conservative organizations like the Mormon Church play an inordinate
role, led them to adopt a policy of blanket discrimination which now has
frankly cost them some of the worst press I can imagine descending upon an
American organization. Think for a moment, who has gotten worse press in
the last six months than the Boy Scouts. Maybe Firestone Tire Company.
[audience laughter] And they have literally blown it with many of us. They
have spent tens of millions of dollars going all the way to the United
States Supreme Court defending their right to discriminate. The concern is
not for the children. The concern is the religious politics they’re
playing. In many communities across this country, Scout troops are
virtually the only youth organizations available for boys. But
congregations in my Association, at least, are now deciding that it’s
difficult to continue to house or sponsor Scout troops, if indeed the BSA
is not going to be controlled by local people, but going to be ordered by
Dallas, their headquarters, to be a discriminatory organization that
offends the conscience even of 15-year old Eagle Scouts. Moreover, I have found them flatly guilty of religious politics in the
way they have treated people of my own small denomination, because we
included in our manual about religious awards for our young people some
expressions of dismay at teaching discrimination. They withdrew
recognition of our Religion and Life Award, quite arbitrarily. And almost
literally threatened that if our young people wore a religious award they
had earned from their church on their uniforms, they should be removed by
Scout authorities. I won’t speak about the way in which they have treated
me personally, refusing to take my telephone calls, insisting in essence
that we do not exist as a religious people. And yet I want you to know that there are other religious communities
besides my own, the one represented by this church as well, which feel as
I do: Reform Judaism, the United Church of Christ, United Methodist Board
on Church and Society, the national Episcopal Church at its General
Convention this summer. All have similarly expressed concern about how an
organization that once had such enormous potential to teach boys and young
men not only about tying knots, but also about what it means to grow up as
a responsible citizen in a pluralistic world. That organization, because
of its playing religious politics, has chosen to abandon its central civic
education mission, and has lost the support and the trust of many of us. I
tell you that saddens me enormously. My own children are daughters, but I have nephews who had hoped to go
into scouting, and who won’t now. They’ll be deprived of a perfectly good
organization because their own religious convictions, like mine, will not
be complicit with an organization that attempts to reduce the human worth
of an entire category of God’s people. This is not the way to model good
behavior for young people. I ask, whatever happened to Scout’s Honor. I
ask the people in Dallas, Texas who now run the Boy Scouts, what is
honorable about this way of teaching young people. I’m ashamed of the
organization. And I virtually weep over what has become of it.
|